Early findings
Sample size: 1 Updated Jan 25, 2026

What couples regret — and what they’d pay for again

These are aggregated patterns from post-wedding responses. This is an early dataset: results can shift as sample size grows.

Surveys in this view
1
After applying filters (if any)
Went over budget
0%
0 of 1
Would do it again (any “Yes”)
0%
0 of 1
Avg stress / satisfaction
3.0 / 5.0
Scale 1–5

Top regrets

Based on “Regret” selections (up to 3 per response). Rate = % of surveys in this view that selected it.

Catering / Bar
1 • 100%
Flowers
1 • 100%
Photography
1 • 100%

Top “worth it” spends

Based on “WorthIt” selections (up to 3 per response).

Attire (Dress/Suit)
1 • 100%
Cake / Desserts
1 • 100%
Ceremony
1 • 100%

Top spend (ranked)

Based on “TopSpend” ranked picks. Points: #1=3, #2=2, #3=1. Rate = % of surveys that included it in top spend.

Catering / Bar
1 • 100% • 3 pts
Photography
1 • 100% • 2 pts
Attire (Dress/Suit)
1 • 100% • 1 pts

Biggest regret drivers

Based on the optional “Biggest regret driver” question (0–1 per response). Rate = % of surveys in this view that chose it.

Cost/value mismatch
1 • 100%

Most overrated vendors

Based on optional “Overrated” selection (0–1 per response).

Catering / Bar
1 • 100%

Most underrated expenses

Based on optional “Underrated” selection (0–1 per response).

Ceremony
1 • 100%
Want these rankings to stabilize faster?
The dataset improves with volume. If you’re already married, your survey response helps future couples avoid expensive mistakes.
Take the survey
Notes
  • Rates are computed within the current filtered view (not global).
  • “Rate” = percent of surveys that selected the item at least once in that section.
  • Regret/Worth-it selections are limited (up to 3 per response).
  • Optional questions (driver/overrated/underrated) may have lower response counts.
  • Top spend includes rank weighting (points) to surface what was truly “top.”
  • Small samples can produce noisy ranks; always read the sample size first.
Read methodology